Sub-Saharan Africa is currently the poorest sub-continent. Most of
its 48 countries have little prospect of achieving the internationally
agreed Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which would mean, for
example, sharply reducing, by 2015, the share of the population living
on less than a dollar a day, lacking access to basic education and
health services or suffering from malnutrition. In addition, and related
to the resilience of poverty, governance is still weak in many African
countries, though a number of them have made progress in terms of
democratisation. And many are plagued by serious problems of public
security or even civil war.
Africa is also a continent neighbouring Europe. The crises there
inevitably have repercussions for the European Union (EU). One clear
sign of this is the large number of Africans who try to bypass EU
immigration controls and to reach Europe, seeking a better life as
well as ways to support their relatives at home. Moreover, weak and
failing states, many of which are in Africa, have come to be regarded
as endangering international security - for example because transnational
criminal or terrorist networks might operate from them. Thus Africa,
which has for the EU long been mainly a case for development engagement,
is now receiving increasing attention from foreign and security policy.
But a consistent European strategy to address Africas crises
has been lacking. This is partly due to the fact that EU member countries
are independent actors in important areas: The EU has only one common
trade policy, but its development policy and the nascent Common Foreign
and Security Policy are paralleled by corresponding national policies
of member states, while immigration is chiefly a national responsibility.
Also, policies of the European Commission in different areas may work
at cross-purposes - for example agricultural subsidies, trade policy
and development policy.
To remedy this, the European Commission, the Council and the Parliament
in December 2005 signed a new common EU Africa Strategy. It is meant
to be a guideline for all policies relevant to Africa of both the
European Commission and the EU member states. While it centres on
helping Africa achieve the MDGs, it puts considerable emphasis on
peace and security as well as good governance. To what extent is this
strategy a step forward, rather than a shopping list of already existing
approaches? What are its strengths and weaknesses? Is the strategy
likely really to make EU policies relating to Africa more coherent?
These were some of the questions dealt with at a conference organized
by the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, terre des homes and World Economy,
Ecology & Development (WEED) in Berlin in April 2006. The statements
made at this conference and the discussions conductedthere are presented
in this publication. The annex documents the EU Africa Strategy of
December 2005. With this publication we hope to contribute to a wider
discussion on the future of Europes relations with Africa.
Peter Eisenblätter, terre des hommes
Klaus Schilder, Weltwirtschaft, Ökologie & Entwicklung
Ralf Hexel, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung